The approach I've been using for a given header is to recursively do each of the "bits" headers which make up the standard header. So, e.g., while there are four headers making up , three of them were already documented in the course of doing other headers. "Untouched" means I've deliberately skipped it for various reasons, or haven't gotten to it yet. It /will/ be done (by somebody, eventually.) Area Still needs to be doxygen-documented ----------------------------------------------------------- c17 FINISHED (Nothing in Clause 17 "exists" in terms of code.) c18 , Note A c19 Note A c20 Note A c21 Untouched, Note B c22 Untouched c23 See doxygroups.cc and Note B. c24 Untouched c25 stl_algo.h (lots of stuff) c26 , , stl_numeric.h[26.4], Note A c27 Untouched backward/* Not scanned by doxygen. Should it be? Doubtful. ext/* Some of the SGI algorithm/functional extensions. All of rope/hashing/slist need docs. __gnu_cxx Tricky. Right now ext/* are in this namespace. ----------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: A) So far I have not tried to document any of the headers. So entities such as atexit() are undocumented throughout the library. Since we usually do not have the C code (to which the doxygen comments would be attached), this would need to be done in entirely separate files, a la doxygroups.cc. B) Huge chunks of containers and strings are described in common "Tables" in the standard. How to reproduce this information? I suspect we should simply write some HTML tables (say, one per Table per file), and use doxygen hooks like @pre and @see to reference the tables. Then the individual classes would do like the standard does, and only document members for which additional info is available. STYLE: stl_deque.h, stl_pair.h, and stl_algobase.h have good examples of what I've been using for class, namespace-scope, and function documentation, respectively. These should serve as starting points. /Please/ maintain the inter-word and inter-sentence spacing, as this might be generated and/or scanned in the future. vim:ts=4:et: