FreeChainXenon/gcc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS rtx type.

Browse source 
2015-05-07  Venkataramanan Kumar  <venkataramanan.kumar@amd.com>

        * combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS
        rtx type.

From-SVN: r222874
This commit is contained in:
Venkataramanan Kumar 2015-05-07 10:47:54 +00:00 • committed by Venkataramanan Kumar
parent 465770e439
commit 963ba1b266
2 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gcc/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2015-05-07 Venkataramanan Kumar <venkataramanan.kumar@amd.com>
* combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS
rtx type.
2015-05-07 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/66002

7
gcc/combine.c
View file

@ -7723,9 +7723,8 @@ extract_left_shift (rtx x, int count)
We try, as much as possible, to re-use rtl expressions to save memory.
IN_CODE says what kind of expression we are processing. Normally, it is
SET. In a memory address (inside a MEM, PLUS or minus, the latter two
being kludges), it is MEM. When processing the arguments of a comparison
or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE. */
SET. In a memory address it is MEM. When processing the arguments of
a comparison or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE. */
rtx
make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code)
@ -7745,8 +7744,6 @@ make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code)
but once inside, go back to our default of SET. */
next_code = (code == MEM ? MEM
: ((code == PLUS || code == MINUS)
&& SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)) ? MEM
: ((code == COMPARE || COMPARISON_P (x))
&& XEXP (x, 1) == const0_rtx) ? COMPARE
: in_code == COMPARE ? SET : in_code);