reassoc: Fold some statements [PR108819]
This spot in update_ops can replace one or both of the assign operands with constants, creating 1 & 1 and similar expressions which can confuse later passes until they are folded. Rather than folding both constants by hand and also handling swapping of operands for commutative ops if the first one is constant and second one is not, the following patch just uses fold_stmt_inplace to do that. I think we shouldn't fold more than the single statement because that could screw up the rest of the pass, we'd have to mark all those with uids, visited and the like. 2023-02-18 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/108819 * tree-ssa-reassoc.cc (update_ops): Fold new stmt in place. * gcc.dg/pr108819.c: New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c135697fd
commit
32b5875c91
2 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions
19
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108819.c
Normal file
19
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108819.c
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||
/* PR tree-optimization/108819 */
|
||||
/* { dg-do compile } */
|
||||
/* { dg-options "-O1 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop" } */
|
||||
|
||||
int a, b;
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
main ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
int d = 1;
|
||||
for (; b; b++)
|
||||
if (a < 1)
|
||||
while (d <= a && a <= 0UL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int *e = &d;
|
||||
*e = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -4687,6 +4687,9 @@ update_ops (tree var, enum tree_code code, const vec<operand_entry *> &ops,
|
|||
gimple_set_uid (g, gimple_uid (stmt));
|
||||
gimple_set_visited (g, true);
|
||||
gsi_insert_before (&gsi, g, GSI_SAME_STMT);
|
||||
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi2 = gsi_for_stmt (g);
|
||||
if (fold_stmt_inplace (&gsi2))
|
||||
update_stmt (g);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return var;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue