cfgrtl: Fix MEM_EXPR update in duplicate_insn_chain [PR114924]
The PR shows that when cfgrtl.cc:duplicate_insn_chain attempts to update the MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE information for a MEM_EXPR we can end up accidentally dropping (e.g.) an ARRAY_REF from the MEM_EXPR and end up replacing it with the underlying MEM_REF. This leads to an inconsistency in the MEM_EXPR information, and could lead to wrong code. While the walk down to the MEM_REF is necessary to update MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE, we should use the outer tree expression for the MEM_EXPR. This patch does that. gcc/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/114924 * cfgrtl.cc (duplicate_insn_chain): When updating MEM_EXPRs, don't strip (e.g.) ARRAY_REFs from the final MEM_EXPR. (cherry picked from commit fe40d525619eee9c2821126390df75068df4773a)
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa7e05d90b
commit
242fbc0df6
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -4432,12 +4432,13 @@ duplicate_insn_chain (rtx_insn *from, rtx_insn *to,
|
|||
since MEM_EXPR is shared so make a copy and
|
||||
walk to the subtree again. */
|
||||
tree new_expr = unshare_expr (MEM_EXPR (*iter));
|
||||
tree orig_new_expr = new_expr;
|
||||
if (TREE_CODE (new_expr) == WITH_SIZE_EXPR)
|
||||
new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0);
|
||||
while (handled_component_p (new_expr))
|
||||
new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0);
|
||||
MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE (new_expr) = newc;
|
||||
set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), new_expr);
|
||||
set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), orig_new_expr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue