invoke.texi: Clarify -march=lujiazui

I was recently searching which exact CPUs are affected by the PR114576
wrong-code issue and went from the PTA_* bitmasks in GCC, so arrived
at the goldmont, goldmont-plus, tremont and lujiazui CPUs (as -march=
cases which do enable -maes and don't enable -mavx).
But when double-checking that against the invoke.texi documentation,
that was true for the first 3, but lujiazui said it supported AVX.
I was really confused by that, until I found the
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604407.html
explanation.  So, seems the CPUs do have AVX and F16C but -march=lujiazui
doesn't enable those and even activelly attempts to filter those out from
the announced CPUID features, in glibc as well as e.g. in libgcc.

Thus, I think we should document what actually happens, otherwise
users could assume that
gcc -march=lujiazui predefines __AVX__ and __F16C__, which it doesn't.

2024-06-04  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* doc/invoke.texi (lujiazui): Clarify that while the CPUs do support
	AVX and F16C, -march=lujiazui actually doesn't enable those.

(cherry picked from commit 09b4ab53155ea16e1fb12c2afcd9b6fe29a31c74)
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek 2024-06-04 12:20:13 +02:00
parent a7dd44c02e
commit 1c1bc2553f

View file

@ -34732,8 +34732,10 @@ instruction set support.
@item lujiazui
ZHAOXIN lujiazui CPU with x86-64, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1,
SSE4.2, AVX, POPCNT, AES, PCLMUL, RDRND, XSAVE, XSAVEOPT, FSGSBASE, CX16,
ABM, BMI, BMI2, F16C, FXSR, RDSEED instruction set support.
SSE4.2, POPCNT, AES, PCLMUL, RDRND, XSAVE, XSAVEOPT, FSGSBASE, CX16,
ABM, BMI, BMI2, FXSR, RDSEED instruction set support. While the CPUs
do support AVX and F16C, these aren't enabled by @code{-march=lujiazui}
for performance reasons.
@item yongfeng
ZHAOXIN yongfeng CPU with x86-64, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1,