[Ada] Prevent overflow in computation of aggregate size
When computing size of a static aggregate to decide if it should be transformed into assignments and loops we could have an overflow check. This is mostly harmless, because colossal aggregates will likely crash the application anyway, no matter how we transform them. This was not detected because compiler was built with -gnatg switch that suppresses overflow checks (they are only enabled by an explicit -gnato switch). gcc/ada/ * exp_aggr.adb (Component_Count): Calculate size as an Uint and only then check if it is in the range of Int, as otherwise the multiplication of Int values can overflow.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b49556e4e
commit
16b8ba101f
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -661,10 +661,10 @@ package body Exp_Aggr is
|
|||
|
||||
declare
|
||||
UI : constant Uint :=
|
||||
Expr_Value (Hi) - Expr_Value (Lo) + 1;
|
||||
(Expr_Value (Hi) - Expr_Value (Lo) + 1) * Siz;
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if UI_Is_In_Int_Range (UI) then
|
||||
return Siz * UI_To_Int (UI);
|
||||
return UI_To_Int (UI);
|
||||
else
|
||||
return Int'Last;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue