testsuite: Fix up pr106070.c test [PR106070]
The test FAILs on 32-bit targets, because when unsigned long is 32-bit, (unsigned long) -1 isn't 0xffffffffffffffff. The options to fix this would be either using -1UL, or switch to unsigned long long and using -1ULL, I chose the latter because the test then FAILs in r13-1242 even on 32-bit targets. And while at it, some deobfuscation and formatting tweaks. 2022-06-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/106070 * gcc.dg/torture/pr106070.c: Use unsigned long long instead of unsigned long and -1ULL instead of 0xffffffffffffffff, deobcuscate and improve formatting.
This commit is contained in:
parent
01e094f82d
commit
00063459f6
1 changed files with 15 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -1,20 +1,22 @@
|
|||
/* { dg-do run } */
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int var_2 = 1;
|
||||
int var_4 = -1;
|
||||
int var_10 = 4;
|
||||
unsigned long arr_252;
|
||||
void __attribute__((noipa)) test() {
|
||||
for (int a = 0; a < var_10; a += 2)
|
||||
arr_252 = var_2 != (int)var_4 ? (unsigned long)var_4 : (unsigned long)var_2;
|
||||
unsigned int a = 1;
|
||||
int b = -1;
|
||||
int c = 4;
|
||||
unsigned long long d;
|
||||
|
||||
void __attribute__((noipa))
|
||||
test (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < c; i += 2)
|
||||
d = a != (int) b ? (unsigned long long) b : (unsigned long long) a;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void test();
|
||||
|
||||
int main()
|
||||
int
|
||||
main ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
test();
|
||||
if (arr_252 != 0xffffffffffffffff)
|
||||
__builtin_abort();
|
||||
test ();
|
||||
if (d != -1ULL)
|
||||
__builtin_abort ();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue