binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/continue-pending-after-query.exp
Tiezhu Yang 4a4fd10d17 gdb: Modify the output of "info breakpoints" and "delete breakpoints"
The output of "info breakpoints" includes breakpoint, watchpoint,
tracepoint, and catchpoint if they are created, so it should show
all the four types are deleted in the output of "info breakpoints"
to report empty list after "delete breakpoints".

It should also change the output of "delete breakpoints" to make it
clear that watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints are also being
deleted. This is suggested by Guinevere Larsen, thank you.

$ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp"
$ gdb/gdb gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/access-mem-running/access-mem-running
[...]
(gdb) break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x12000073c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 32.
(gdb) watch global_counter
Hardware watchpoint 2: global_counter
(gdb) trace maybe_stop_here
Tracepoint 3 at 0x12000071c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 27.
(gdb) catch fork
Catchpoint 4 (fork)
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num     Type           Disp Enb Address            What
1       breakpoint     keep y   0x000000012000073c in main at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:32
2       hw watchpoint  keep y                      global_counter
3       tracepoint     keep y   0x000000012000071c in maybe_stop_here at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:27
	not installed on target
4       catchpoint     keep y                      fork

Without this patch:

(gdb) delete breakpoints
Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
(gdb) info breakpoints
No breakpoints or watchpoints.
(gdb) info breakpoints 3
No breakpoint or watchpoint matching '3'.

With this patch:

(gdb) delete breakpoints
Delete all breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints? (y or n) y
(gdb) info breakpoints
No breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, or catchpoints.
(gdb) info breakpoints 3
No breakpoint, watchpoint, tracepoint, or catchpoint matching '3'.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-02-26 19:19:58 +08:00

90 lines
2.8 KiB
Text

# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
#
# Copyright 2013-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Regression test for a bug that would go like this:
#
# - Run to a breakpoint that is hit by two threads (A and B)
# simultaneously.
#
# - One of the breakpoint hits is processed (e.g., thread A) and
# causes a user-visible stop. The other (thread B) is left pending.
#
# - The user deletes the breakpoint with "del", which causes a
# confirmation query.
#
# - By mistake, that would result in the target being left with async
# enabled, even though it wasn't to begin with.
#
# - GDB reacts to target async enablement by polling for target
# events. As no thread is resumed the target replies
# TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED.
#
# - The user continues the program, expecting it to exit. The thread
# that has an event pending (thread B) is not really resumed.
#
# - But, nothing signals the event loop that there's a pending event
# waiting to be collected for thread B, so that event is never
# processed, thread B is never resumed and the program never exits.
#
# Ref: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00592.html
standard_testfile
if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile {debug pthreads}] == -1} {
return -1
}
proc test {} {
global srcfile gdb_prompt
if ![runto_main] {
return -1
}
delete_breakpoints
set bp_line [gdb_get_line_number "set break here" $srcfile]
gdb_breakpoint "break_function"
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "cont to break_function" ".*$srcfile:$bp_line\r\n.*"
# Do something that causes a query/secondary prompt.
set test "delete breakpoints, answer prompt"
set saw_prompt 0
gdb_test_multiple "delete breakpoints" $test {
-re "Delete all breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints.*y or n.*$" {
set saw_prompt 1
send_gdb "y\n"
exp_continue
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
gdb_assert $saw_prompt $test
}
}
gdb_continue_to_end "" "continue" 1
}
# Test a few times to make sure an event is left pending. At the time
# of writing, the bug always triggers, but that might naturally depend
# on machine.
for {set i 1} {$i <= 10} {incr i} {
with_test_prefix "iter $i" {
test
}
}