Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame instead of a
regcache. The frame (and formerly the regcache) is used to read raw
registers needed to make up the pseudo register value. The problem with
using the regcache is that it always provides raw register values for
the current frame (frame 0).
Let's say the user wants to read the ebx register on amd64. ebx is a pseudo
register, obtained by reading the bottom half (bottom 4 bytes) of the
rbx register, which is a raw register. If the currently selected frame
is frame 0, it works fine:
(gdb) frame 0
#0 break_here_asm () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:36
36 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S
(gdb) p/x $ebx
$1 = 0x24252627
(gdb) p/x $rbx
$2 = 0x2021222324252627
But if the user is looking at another frame, and the raw register behind
the pseudo register has been saved at some point in the call stack, then
we get a wrong answer:
(gdb) frame 1
#1 0x000055555555517d in caller () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:56
56 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S
(gdb) p/x $ebx
$3 = 0x24252627
(gdb) p/x $rbx
$4 = 0x1011121314151617
Here, the value of ebx was computed using the value of rbx in frame 0
(through the regcache), it should have been computed using the value of
rbx in frame 1.
In other to make this work properly, make the following changes:
- Make dwarf2_frame_prev_register return nullptr if it doesn't know how
to unwind a register and that register is a pseudo register.
Previously, it returned `frame_unwind_got_register`, meaning, in our
example, "the value of ebx in frame 1 is the same as the value of ebx
in frame 0", which is obviously false. Return nullptr as a way to
say "I don't know".
- In frame_unwind_register_value, when prev_register (for instance
dwarf2_frame_prev_register) returns nullptr, and we are trying to
read a pseudo register, try to get the register value through
gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value or gdbarch_pseudo_register_read.
If using gdbarch_pseudo_register_read, the behavior is known to be
broken. Implementations should be migrated to use
gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to fix that.
- Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame_info
instead of a regcache, update implementations (aarch64, amd64, i386).
In i386-tdep.c, I made a copy of i386_mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum that
uses a frame instead of a regcache. The version using the regcache
is still used by i386_pseudo_register_write. It will get removed in
a subsequent patch.
- Add some helpers in value.{c,h} to implement the common cases of
pseudo registers: taking part of a raw register and concatenating
multiple raw registers.
- Update readable_regcache::{cooked_read,cooked_read_value} to pass the
current frame to gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value. Passing the
current frame will give the same behavior as before: for frame 0, raw
registers will be read from the current thread's regcache.
Notes:
- I do not plan on changing gdbarch_pseudo_register_read to receive a
frame instead of a regcache. That method is considered deprecated.
Instead, we should be working on migrating implementations to use
gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value instead.
- In frame_unwind_register_value, we still ask the unwinder to try to
unwind pseudo register values. It's apparently possible for the
debug info to provide information about [1] pseudo registers, so we
want to try that first, before falling back to computing them
ourselves.
[1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20180528174715.A954AD804AD@oc3748833570.ibm.com/
Change-Id: Id6ef1c64e19090a183dec050e4034d8c2394e7ca
Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
b3245ceff0