This commit removes some, but not all, uses of LA_PRINT_STRING. In
this commit I've removed those uses where there is an obvious language
object on which I can instead call the printstr method.
In the remaining 3 uses it is harder to know if the correct thing is
to call printstr on the current language, or on a specific language.
Currently obviously, we always call on the current language (as that's
what LA_PRINT_STRING does), and clearly this behaviour is good enough
right now, but is it "right"? I've left them for now and will give
them more thought in the future.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* expprint.c (print_subexp_standard): Replace uses of
LA_PRINT_STRING.
* f-valprint.c (f_language::value_print_inner): Likewise.
* guile/scm-pretty-print.c (ppscm_print_string_repr): Likewise.
* p-valprint.c (pascal_language::value_print_inner): Likewise.
* python/py-prettyprint.c (print_string_repr): Likewise.
5cc0917c38