1d506c26d9
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
100 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
100 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
# Copyright 2005-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
|
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
# (at your option) any later version.
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
#
|
|
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
require {istarget "alpha*-*-*"}
|
|
|
|
set testfile "alpha-step"
|
|
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
|
|
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
|
|
|
|
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {}] != "" } {
|
|
unsupported "failed to compile"
|
|
return -1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
clean_restart $binfile
|
|
|
|
proc test_stepi {function } {
|
|
# Restart the program from scratch. If GDB got confused during one
|
|
# of the previous tests, this makes sure that it doesn't affect
|
|
# this series of tests.
|
|
if {![runto_main]} {
|
|
return 0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Insert a breakpoint on the FP branch instruction inside FUNCTION.
|
|
# Since the function has been hand written, we know this instruction
|
|
# is a "fb$function" located at FUNCTION+4.
|
|
gdb_test "break *$function+4" \
|
|
"Breakpoint .* at .*" \
|
|
"breakpoint on fb$function instruction"
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "continue" \
|
|
"Breakpoint .*, 0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ in $function\(\).*" \
|
|
"continue to fb$function instruction (first call)"
|
|
|
|
# Extra check to make sure we stopped on the FP branch instruction.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function.*" \
|
|
"Check breakpoint on fb$function instruction (first call)"
|
|
|
|
# Step test, followed by the check that we landed on the expected
|
|
# instruction (the testcase should be written in such a way that
|
|
# the branch is taken on the first call to this function.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "stepi" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+.*" \
|
|
"stepi on fb$function (first call)"
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+ret.*" \
|
|
"Check stepi over fb$function stopped on ret"
|
|
|
|
# Continue again. FUNCTION should be called a second time, this time
|
|
# with an argument such that the FP branch will not be taken.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "continue" \
|
|
"Breakpoint .*, 0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ in $function\(\).*" \
|
|
"continue to fb$function instruction (second call)"
|
|
|
|
# Extra check to make sure we stopped on the FP branch instruction.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function.*" \
|
|
"Check breakpoint on fb$function instruction (second call)"
|
|
|
|
# Step test, branch should not be taken.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "stepi" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+.*" \
|
|
"stepi on fb$function (branch not taken)"
|
|
|
|
# Extra check to verify that we landed on the instruction we expected.
|
|
|
|
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
|
|
"0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fneg.*" \
|
|
"check stepi over fb$function stopped on fneg instruction"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test_stepi "gt"
|
|
test_stepi "ge"
|
|
test_stepi "lt"
|
|
test_stepi "le"
|
|
test_stepi "eq"
|
|
test_stepi "ne"
|
|
|