FreeChainXenon/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix gdb.ada/info_addr_mixed_case.exp (PR gdb/22670)

Browse source 
The comments about mixed case in the testcase are actually a red
herring.  The problem here is that we'd get to
ada_lookup_encoded_symbol with "my_table", which wraps the looked up
name in "<>"s to force a verbatim match, and that in turn disables
wild matching.

Fix this by swapping around the internals of ada_lookup_encoded_symbol
and ada_lookup_symbol, thus avoiding the encoding and
verbatim-wrapping in the ada_lookup_symbol case, the case that starts
with a user-provided lookup name.

Ada encoding is still done of course, in the ada_lookup_name_info
ctor.  This could be also seen as avoiding the double-encoding problem
in a different way.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-01-05  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/22670
	* ada-lang.c (ada_lookup_encoded_symbol): Reimplement in terms of
	ada_lookup_symbol.
	(ada_lookup_symbol): Reimplement in terms of
	ada_lookup_symbol_list, bits factored out from
	ada_lookup_encoded_symbol.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-01-05  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/22670
	* gdb.ada/info_addr_mixed_case.exp: Remove kfail.  Extend test to
	exercise lower case too, and to exercise both full matching and
	wild matching.
This commit is contained in:
Pedro Alves 2018-01-05 16:01:57 +00:00
parent 342f824039
commit f98fc17b3a
4 changed files with 42 additions and 32 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

43
gdb/ada-lang.c
View file

@ -5911,10 +5911,6 @@ ada_lookup_encoded_symbol (const char *name, const struct block *block,
domain_enum domain,
struct block_symbol *info)
{
struct block_symbol *candidates;
int n_candidates;
struct cleanup *old_chain;
/* Since we already have an encoded name, wrap it in '<>' to force a
verbatim match. Otherwise, if the name happens to not look like
an encoded name (because it doesn't include a "__"),
@ -5924,22 +5920,7 @@ ada_lookup_encoded_symbol (const char *name, const struct block *block,
std::string verbatim = std::string ("<") + name + '>';
gdb_assert (info != NULL);
memset (info, 0, sizeof (struct block_symbol));
n_candidates = ada_lookup_symbol_list (verbatim.c_str (), block,
domain, &candidates);
old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, candidates);
if (n_candidates == 0)
{
do_cleanups (old_chain);
return;
}
*info = candidates[0];
info->symbol = fixup_symbol_section (info->symbol, NULL);
do_cleanups (old_chain);
*info = ada_lookup_symbol (verbatim.c_str (), block, domain, NULL);
}
/* Return a symbol in DOMAIN matching NAME, in BLOCK0 and enclosing
@ -5952,13 +5933,27 @@ struct block_symbol
ada_lookup_symbol (const char *name, const struct block *block0,
domain_enum domain, int *is_a_field_of_this)
{
struct block_symbol info;
if (is_a_field_of_this != NULL)
*is_a_field_of_this = 0;
ada_lookup_encoded_symbol (ada_encode (ada_fold_name (name)),
block0, domain, &info);
struct block_symbol *candidates;
int n_candidates;
struct cleanup *old_chain;
n_candidates = ada_lookup_symbol_list (name, block0, domain, &candidates);
old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, candidates);
if (n_candidates == 0)
{
do_cleanups (old_chain);
return {};
}
block_symbol info = candidates[0];
info.symbol = fixup_symbol_section (info.symbol, NULL);
do_cleanups (old_chain);
return info;
}