gdb: avoid dereferencing empty str_offsets_base optional in dwarf_decode_macros
Since4d7188abfd
("gdbsupport: add debug assertions in gdb::optional::get"), some macro-related tests fail on Ubuntu 20.04 with the system gcc 9.3.0 compiler when building with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG. For example, gdb.base/info-macros.exp results in: (gdb) break -qualified main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/gdb_optional.h:206: internal-error: T& gdb::optional<T>::get() [with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `this->has_value ()' failed. The binary contains DWARF 4 debug info and includes a pre-standard (pre-DWARF 5) .debug_macro section. The CU doesn't have a DW_AT_str_offsets_base attribute (which doesn't exist in DWARF 4). The field dwarf2_cu::str_offsets_base is therefore empty. At dwarf2/read.c:24138, we unconditionally read the value in the optional, which triggers the assertion shown above. The same thing happens when building the test program with DWARF 5 with the same gcc compiler, as that version of gcc doesn't use indirect string forms, even with DWARF 5. So it still doesn't add a DW_AT_str_offsets_base attribute on the CU. Fix that by propagating down a gdb::optional<ULONGEST> for the str offsets base instead of ULONGEST. That value is only used in dwarf_decode_macro_bytes, when encountering an "strx" macro operation (DW_MACRO_define_strx or DW_MACRO_undef_strx). Add a check there that we indeed have a value in the optional before reading it. This is unlikely to happen, but could happen in theory with an erroneous file that uses DW_MACRO_define_strx but does not provide a DW_AT_str_offsets_base (in practice, some things would probably have failed before and stopped processing of debug info). I tested the complaint by inverting the condition and using a clang-compiled binary, which uses the strx operators. This is the result: During symbol reading: use of DW_MACRO_define_strx with unknown string offsets base [in module /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/info-macros/info-macros] The test now passes cleanly with the setup mentioned above, and the testsuite looks on par with how it was before4d7188abfd
. Change-Id: I7ebd2724beb7b9b4178872374c2a177aea696e77
This commit is contained in:
parent
d40947728b
commit
f6c4a82abd
3 changed files with 20 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -24122,7 +24122,7 @@ dwarf_decode_macros (struct dwarf2_cu *cu, unsigned int offset,
|
|||
|
||||
struct dwarf2_section_info *str_offsets_section;
|
||||
struct dwarf2_section_info *str_section;
|
||||
ULONGEST str_offsets_base;
|
||||
gdb::optional<ULONGEST> str_offsets_base;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cu->dwo_unit != nullptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -24135,7 +24135,7 @@ dwarf_decode_macros (struct dwarf2_cu *cu, unsigned int offset,
|
|||
{
|
||||
str_offsets_section = &per_objfile->per_bfd->str_offsets;
|
||||
str_section = &per_objfile->per_bfd->str;
|
||||
str_offsets_base = *cu->str_offsets_base;
|
||||
str_offsets_base = cu->str_offsets_base;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dwarf_decode_macros (per_objfile, builder, section, lh,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue