x86: tighten condition for emitting LOCK on control register accesses
The control register is never expressed by REX.B; this bit only affects the involved GPR. Also only one of the operands can have its "control" flag set, so only check the correct operand.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6479571075
commit
e0c7f90025
2 changed files with 9 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
|||
2018-06-01 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/tc-i386.c (build_modrm_byte): Drop REX_B from condition
|
||||
checking for the need of emitting LOCK. Check "control" bit just
|
||||
once.
|
||||
|
||||
2018-06-01 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* testsuite/gas/i386/invpcid.s,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6894,12 +6894,11 @@ build_modrm_byte (void)
|
|||
if ((i.op[source].regs->reg_flags & RegVRex) != 0)
|
||||
i.vrex |= REX_R;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (flag_code != CODE_64BIT && (i.rex & (REX_R | REX_B)))
|
||||
if (flag_code != CODE_64BIT && (i.rex & REX_R))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!i.types[0].bitfield.control
|
||||
&& !i.types[1].bitfield.control)
|
||||
if (!i.types[i.tm.operand_types[0].bitfield.regmem].bitfield.control)
|
||||
abort ();
|
||||
i.rex &= ~(REX_R | REX_B);
|
||||
i.rex &= ~REX_R;
|
||||
add_prefix (LOCK_PREFIX_OPCODE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue