Add comment in dwarf2read.c::read_subrange_type
This comment explains why we sometimes sign-extend the range type bounds when we normally shouldn't have to. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2read.c (read_subrange_type): Add comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
55426c9d52
commit
dbb9c2b1f2
2 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
|||
2014-02-27 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* dwarf2read.c (read_subrange_type): Add comment.
|
||||
|
||||
2014-02-27 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* dwarf2read.c (update_enumeration_type_from_children): New
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -14522,6 +14522,13 @@ read_subrange_type (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Normally, the DWARF producers are expected to use a signed
|
||||
constant form (Eg. DW_FORM_sdata) to express negative bounds.
|
||||
But this is unfortunately not always the case, as witnessed
|
||||
with GCC, for instance, where the ambiguous DW_FORM_dataN form
|
||||
is used instead. To work around that ambiguity, we treat
|
||||
the bounds as signed, and thus sign-extend their values, when
|
||||
the base type is signed. */
|
||||
negative_mask =
|
||||
(LONGEST) -1 << (TYPE_LENGTH (base_type) * TARGET_CHAR_BIT - 1);
|
||||
if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (base_type) && (low & negative_mask))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue