2007-06-09 Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
* gdbarch.sh (ADDR_BITS_REMOVE): Replace by gdbarch_addr_bits_remove. * value.c (value_as_address): Likewise (comment). * remote-mips.c (common_breakpoint): Likewise. * regcache.c (read_pc_pid): Likewise. * printcmd.c (do_one_display): Likewise. * monitor.c (monitor_write_memory, monitor_read_memory) (monitor_insert_breakpoint): Likewise. * mips-tdep.c (heuristic_proc_start): Likewise. * infrun.c (insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_frame) (insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_caller): Likewise. * buildsym.c (record_line): Likewise. * arm-tdep.c (arm_scan_prologue, thumb_get_next_pc) (arm_get_next_pc): Likewise. * armnbsd-nat.c (arm_supply_gregset, fetch_register, store_register) (store_regs): Likewise. * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_supply_gregset): Likewise. * arm-linux-nat.c (fetch_register, fetch_regs): Likewise. * gdbarch.c, gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9f4d5725d
commit
bf6ae4641c
16 changed files with 70 additions and 49 deletions
|
@ -962,10 +962,10 @@ value_as_address (struct value *val)
|
|||
/* Assume a CORE_ADDR can fit in a LONGEST (for now). Not sure
|
||||
whether we want this to be true eventually. */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/* ADDR_BITS_REMOVE is wrong if we are being called for a
|
||||
/* gdbarch_addr_bits_remove is wrong if we are being called for a
|
||||
non-address (e.g. argument to "signal", "info break", etc.), or
|
||||
for pointers to char, in which the low bits *are* significant. */
|
||||
return ADDR_BITS_REMOVE (value_as_long (val));
|
||||
return gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (current_gdbarch, value_as_long (val));
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
/* There are several targets (IA-64, PowerPC, and others) which
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue