FreeChainXenon/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_frame_cache): Fix comment.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Mark Kettenis 2004-02-28 18:07:58 +00:00
parent dbda997201
commit 4a28816e79
2 changed files with 10 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2004-02-28 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_frame_cache): Fix comment.
2004-02-28 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* utils.c: Use "", instead of <>, to include readline.

13
gdb/amd64-tdep.c
View file

@ -790,13 +790,12 @@ amd64_frame_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame, void **this_cache)
if (cache->frameless_p)
{
/* We didn't find a valid frame, which means that CACHE->base
currently holds the frame pointer for our calling frame. If
we're at the start of a function, or somewhere half-way its
prologue, the function's frame probably hasn't been fully
setup yet. Try to reconstruct the base address for the stack
frame by looking at the stack pointer. For truly "frameless"
functions this might work too. */
/* We didn't find a valid frame. If we're at the start of a
function, or somewhere half-way its prologue, the function's
frame probably hasn't been fully setup yet. Try to
reconstruct the base address for the stack frame by looking
at the stack pointer. For truly "frameless" functions this
might work too. */
frame_unwind_register (next_frame, AMD64_RSP_REGNUM, buf);
cache->base = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 8) + cache->sp_offset;